<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NGPixel &#187; Audio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ngpixel.com/category/audio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ngpixel.com</link>
	<description>The Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:57:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reaper &gt; Cubase 5</title>
		<link>http://www.ngpixel.com/2009/12/27/reaper-cubase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ngpixel.com/2009/12/27/reaper-cubase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ngpixel.com/2009/12/27/reaper-cubase/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAW software are quite expensive, about 300-500$ depending on the version. I was looking to upgrade my Cubase AI 4 which is 32bit only to a 64bit-capable DAW. Cubase Studio 5 was the logical choice with it’s new 64bit version. Then I saw the price: 339$. Not quite what you call a deal, only to get  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DAW software are quite expensive, about 300-500$ depending on the version. I was looking to upgrade my Cubase AI 4 which is 32bit only to a 64bit-capable DAW. Cubase Studio 5 was the logical choice with it’s new 64bit version. Then I saw the price: 339$. Not quite what you call a deal, only to get 64bit support. Considering version 5 had no useful new features (only ANOTHER beat maker among the new “features”, as if we needed YET ANOTHER one). So it was clear I wasn’t going to buy this.</p>
<p>Then I read on <a href="http://www.soundsonline.com/" target="_blank">EastWest</a> forums about <a href="http://www.reaper.fm/" target="_blank">Reaper</a>. It’s a DAW that is even more optimized than Cubase, has 64bit support, free routing of MIDI and audio. The price? 60$. But wait, prepare to be shocked, it only does everything Cubase 5 can do and more. Another surprise? It’s less than 5mb and the license is good for another major upgrade in the future. It looks even better than Cubase 5.</p>
<p>But the best thing about Reaper is the workflow. In less than 2 minutes, I was ready to go, VSTis loaded and ready to play. It appears to be much more stable than Cubase as well and an even lower latency.</p>
<p>I’m still using the 30-day evaluation version but I’m definitely getting a license in the next weeks.</p>
<p>Finally an audio product made by audio developers and not a marketing team.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ngpixel.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/image.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.ngpixel.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/image_thumb.png" width="244" height="172" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ngpixel.com/2009/12/27/reaper-cubase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

